Tag Archive for 'Business Continuity'

Business Continuity Begins at Home

Operational Risk and Business Continuity go hand-in-hand. The most common potential failure I have seen regarding an external event is a lack of preparedness by key personnel at the personal level. If a severe natural disaster or riots disrupt a large urban area, most organisations would fail to implement their emergency plan or be able to maintain emergency operations because the key personnel and their families are not prepared for such emergencies.

We have all heard of the proverbial “Three-day  Emergency Kit” promoted by government disaster planning organisations.  Unfortunately this limit is not realistic for most situations. The “72 hours” limit is a military standard based upon the ability of a functioning logistics establishment. Soldiers get re-supplied, but who will  re-supply you after 72 hours?

If the key personnel are not able to keep their families warm, fed, and safe with the supplies on hand, then they will not show-up to keep the company running. Planning for this type of business interruption starts with the people who will keep things running during the emergency, and that includes their families.

Recently, a client got to try-out their well-laid plans. They were very fortunate to have their emergency operations centre only about 60 miles from their normal location. They had the foresight to preposition food, shelter, and equipment. However, the after-action reports revealed some critical failures.

The first was the inadequate physical conditioning of the key personnel. Most had to walk, with their immediate families, for a maximum of 8 miles to get out of the disaster area to where transport was waiting. Communication was adequate as the company radio system remained functional to allow the transport part of the plan to work properly. However, some key personnel could not make the walk due to poor physical conditioning or poor health. The company had not even considered this factor in planning, or when selecting key personnel.

The other critical failure was an utter lack of planning or preparation on the part of the key personnel and the company did not offer any training or guidance on how to hike the distance required. None of the key staff had proper boots or clothing. None had a proper pack, DEET, bug suit, or anything else of practical value. The weather was wet, cold for the season, and the biting insects were out in force. This could have been the second disaster.

This company did many things right. They had a kitchen and 2 weeks of food. They had a former ER nurse on-site. They had emergency housing on-site. They had communications and the equipment needed to keep operating. What they didn’t have was staff. Over one-half of the key staff were unable, or unprepared, to walk to the rally point.

The Sky is Falling

Urban Astronomer reports a trial run of the new PS1 telescope on Mount Haleakala in Hawaii found a record nineteen near-earth asteroids in its first night of use.  I just thought you should know.

Disasters Happen

The Kroger Co. Headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, Kroger (NYSE:KR) is one of the nation’s largest grocery retailers, with fiscal 2009 sales of $76.7 billion. The company’s operations span many U.S. states with store formats that include grocery and multi-department stores, convenience stores and mall jewelry stores. The company also operates under nearly two dozen banners.

This savvy corporation operates a disaster  planning and preparation function within its logistics department that should put many levels of government to shame.

Cyber Warfare & Business Continuity

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission report for 2010 outlines an interesting event that has significant bearing on business continuity. It seems that China rerouted 15% of all the Internet traffic through Chinese servers for 18 minutes on 8 April 2010. They did this by having their servers announce that they  provided the quickest route for messages. Of course, the Chinese deny any responsibility for this.

The Chinese government is clearly experimenting with using the Internet as part of an asymmetrical warfare strategy, as are other countries. Where does this leave your business should a spate of cyberwarfare break-out? Your company operations might be located thousands of miles from any real battlefield, but a war that brings down the Internet or isolates your company from its customers could spell disaster.

Have you examined how you might maintain your relationship with customers and suppliers without the Internet? Do you have any idea what logistical and financial resources will be required to maintain those relationships? Have you identified the point where you would cease operations and seek bankruptcy protection should the Internet cease to operate?

These are uncomfortable questions, but they have to be asked. In February the former U.S. intelligence chief, told congress that the U.S. would lose a cyberwar if one broke out today. He said, “We’re the most vulnerable, we’re the most connected, we have the most to lose.” Unfortunately, the same can be said of Canada which routes much of its Internet traffic through the United States.

Business Continuity Writ Large

The BBC bunker they don’t want you to know about

Buried 10 storeys into the hillside is a fully functioning nuclear bunker, built at great expense in 1966, at the height of the Cold War…

Measuring 175ft long, the bunker – known to high command as Pawn: Protected Area Wood Norton – remains ready for service in the event of an attack on London.

The Toilet Paper Shortage of 1973

The writers for Johnny Carson heard that the U.S government was having a hard time getting bids for the supply toilet paper and that it might be possible that in a few months the United States could face a shortage of toilet tissue.  They took the words of a Wisconsin congressman who said this, Harold Froehlich, and decided to add a joke for Carson for the next evening show.

This had some far-reaching and unintended consequences. Continue reading ‘The Toilet Paper Shortage of 1973′

The RICE Method of Analysis

Use the RICE method to decide how to respond to information or intelligence:

R for reliability. The basic truthfulness or accuracy of the information you are evaluating.

I  for the importance of the data based upon its releveance

C  for the cost of your possible reactions or actions relating to the information

E  for the effectiveness of your  actions based upon this information. Would actions based upon this information solve the problems you face?

This format is useful for summarizing collected data and for analyzing how you might apply the data in a broad range of situations.

PS:

Just remember, as the old pessimist philosopher Arnold Schopenhauer stated, “The truth will set you free . . . but first it will make you miserable.”