I know you still want to use Google without giving away all your personal data. To accomplish this while using Firefox, use the Searchonymous extension. With this, you can stay signed into your Google account while searching and Google won’t know it’s you doing the search. It also gets rid of most of the annoying ads.
Archive for the 'Private Investigator' Category
Page 2 of 18
Losing your smart phone can be more that inconvenience if your are an active private investigator. Over at PInow, Kelly Cory’s article titled How to Keep Your Smartphone Secure offers some sound advice.
Wolfram Alpha is an interesting answer engine. It answers questions by computing the answer from curated, structured data, rather than providing a list of web pages that contain the search words like normal search engines.
Investigations often hinge on local conditions such as weather. When I need to estimate the weather conditions or compare someone’s description of the weather to actual conditions, I type in a search term like “what was the weather in toronto on july 1, 1967″. Sometimes, Wolfram Alpha has no data from which to formulate an answer such as happened with this search. If you substitute the years 1950 or 2000 you get answers, but not for 1967.
Of course I verify what I get from Wolfram Alpha through official sources.
Eyewitness testimony is the weakest evidence an investigator can collect. The vessel that contains this evidence is subject to illness, death, corruption, and a myriad of defects that compromise the evidence. Being a trained investigator does not make you immune to all these weaknesses.
How we access and share information and how we communicate has changed dramatically over the last 30 years. This evolving technology is changing how we conduct investigations. It is changing how we observe criminal activity. The number sources of evidence available in some investigations have become overwhelming.
The Investigator as an Internet Eyewitness
The key to believable evidence gathered from the Internet is that it is visual, understandable, and could be reproduced if someone else did it at the same time as when it was originally collected.
When I review an investigation, I apply these criteria to determine if it was done by an expert or a bodger.
Investigators are taking on the role of eyewitness by observing evidence that might not be visible to any other available investigator as it appears only momentarily in internet venues. To be a reliable eyewitness, the investigator needs to create a record of what he or she sees at any particular point in time. This must be done in the same manner as handwritten notes. However, these records must provide a visual representation of the evidence collected. With Investigative Internet Research, the computer’s camera and mic, along with software that records screen activity, become the investigator’s notebook.
Typically, screenshots combined with written eyewitness reports, are used to record what an investigator observes in social media and other internet sites. However, screenshots and written reports do not provide a full representation of the research process or the evidence uncovered.
Twenty pages of social media content along with text detailing each screenshot is time consuming to produce and mind-numbing for a Judge or jury to endure. The Judge and jury need an eyewitness to tell them what happened and to illustrate why they should believe this evidence.
As with any eyewitness testimony, two corroborating witnesses are much better than one. The second eyewitness improves the credibility of the evidence presented in the courtroom. The consistency of the eyewitness testimony needs to be established through documentation as would be done with traditional witness statements given at different times to police before trial.
Follow the Script
Wherever possible, rehearse the visual, logical, and reproducible nature of the witness testimony to produce a clean copy of the investigators’ witness testimony. Don’t be afraid to script the testimony. Don’t be afraid to admit scripting the recorded testimony. Explain, if asked, that the recorded collection process is just a representation of what you did without any irrelevant material or wasted time. Explain that the recorded collection process is what really happened as it happened.
The hallmark of a good report is that it looks organised and complete without being over crowded with text and other material. The recorded testimony of the investigators must also be organised and complete without any extraneous content. Sometimes, accomplishing this requires scripting and rehearsal.
The investigator’s recorded process of collection must present the page as he saw it and the viewer must see and hear the investigator as he goes through the collection process. Just because you did this before and scripted the presentation of your collection process does not make the recorded content any less valid.
Above all else, be logical. The collection process must proceed in a straight line from a clearly explained starting point to the next logical point. Continue in like fashion until you reach a logical conclusion.
Explain the logic and connections in the accompanying report. Your report will probably need elements from PowerPoint, screen shots, images, graphs, etc. to accomplish this. Use visual aids to make connections and illustrate logic!
Explain how you got there. Explain what you saw. Explain the importance of what you found. Explain material that meets the elements of the offence or supports the continuation of the offence in some way.
The viewer must see and hear the second investigator doing the same thing as the first investigator. The viewer must see the second investigator collect the same material as the first one. Doing this will require some scripting and rehearsal.
Some situations happen too fast to allow scripting and rehearsal. In that case, you will have to use the raw recording of the IIR that captured the evidence. Even if you are creating a scripted and rhearsed presentation of the collected evidence, you should have a recording of the original IIR collection effort.
Images that appear on a web site offer many insights into the people who created the site. They tell you if they have the money to buy copyrighted content, or that they took the time to create their own imagery to get across their message. The imagery may also tell you that they don’t respect copyright law. The use of the same image on several sites may indicate a relationship between the sites that use the image.
Bing now offers an image search facility that allows you to paste the specific image URL into the search box at Bing.com/images. If you have a picture that you want to match, then you may upload it directly to Bing.com/Images and Bing will search for matches. To match an image, submit a URL, or upload an image, just click on image match.
When you come across an image on a site you find in the Bing Web results, go to Bing Image search and clear the search box. That will make the Image Match link appear next to the search box. When using this, the best approach is to have Bing Web open in one tab and Bing Images in another. As you click on Web results, they will open in a new tab between Bing Web and Bing Images. To isolate the images you wish to search, in Firefox, right click the image and click on view image. This will take you to the image itself and its unique URL. This makes it easier for Bing to isolate the image it is trying to match.
I have never liked dealing with witnesses. They are fickle things that frustrate and annoy me. They change their stories or offer-up bizarre versions of events. Eye witnesses are the bane of any experienced investigator. A news item and my own failure to observe accurately this morning illustrate the dangers of relying on the eye witness.
The first item is comical the second not nearly so. Early this morning a taxi driver discharged his passenger and then got stuck in the snow. He called police saying he couldn’t get out of his car because there was a bear circling his car.
The second example is something much more personal. I have been fighting a cold that migrated to my lungs. During an online interview I began to feel very disoriented and lightheaded. I had to stop the interview but I had no idea what was happening to me.
In a past life I was both a diver and a pilot. I was trained to recognise hypoxia and I had experienced it firsthand during operations. On a quiet morning, during an online interview, I was wholly unable to make out what was happening to me.
So many things can effect what an eye witness reports. The cab driver was a city guy with no experience with dogs or bears. He couldn’t distinguish between a bear and Bear the Newfoundland dog. I wasn’t in a high performance aircraft or underwater with a dodgy re-breather. My environment and mindset this morning made it impossible for me to realize that I was suffering from hypoxia brought on by a lung infection.
Witness testimony may be critical to most investigations, but please give me physical evidence that can be sent to a lab for analysis or documents that can be read, examined, and filed away until trial.
Recently, I had run-in with the FinSpy trojan, or some variation of it. FinSpy is a component of the surveillance product FinFisher, a commercial trojan made and sold by Gamma International, a UK company. This thing was sold to some very nasty state actors, but now it’s in the wild. It allows the operator of the trojan to have complete access to the computer. Its design makes it very difficult for the target or his anti-virus software to recognise its presence. It even permits the villain to activate the computer’s webcam and microphone to see and hear what is happening near the computer. Everything collected by the trojan goes to a command and control server located somewhere on the Internet.
This insidious thing tried to masquerade as Firefox. I think it was part of an image I examined for Exif data. It tried to ‘update” Firefox. The funny thing was that I wasn’t using Firefox, but a browser based on it. I was conducting the research within a Windows virtual machine hosted on a Linux distribution; therefore, it was unable to cause any damage.
What surprised me was that the subjects had seeded the site with information that would interest me to get FinSpy onto my PC. They created the site to gather intelligence on anyone who might investigate them. They are not state actors, just a bunch of criminals.
So you want to use Chrome as your browser. Are you aware that it has recently been reported that a Chrome Bug Allows Sites to Listen to Your Private Conversations?
The best way to avoid this threat is as follows:
- Go to chrome://settings/content
- Scroll down to Media
- Select “Do not allow any sites to access my camera and microphone.
This will disable Google’s Conversational Search, etc. but security will be increased.
I never liked the way Chrome ‘phoned home’ to Google with user tracking, bug tracking etc. I have also found extensions that had malware-filled updates. However, it is faster than Firefox, which over the course of a research project may save hours of extra time. I resisted using Chrome due to security & privacy issues.
I now use is Comodo Dragon, which is based on the open-source Chrome browser, however, it is more private and secure if used properly. I disable the camera & mic as SOP, so I haven’t investigated how Dragon responds to this exploit. The setting change that I outlined was in reference to the actual Chrome browser and this particular exploit, there may be more that I don’t know about.
I am very careful about exposing myself to the internet. My outward-facing computers don’t have cameras or mics to entirely circumvent malicious software like this and the likes of Finspy.
The browser is the most used outward facing software you will use. It interacts with suspect web sites and other internet sites. Firefox is still my first choice for security and plug-ins, even though Chrome offers a speed advantage that adds-up over the course of many hours of research, while this little problem makes me avoid MS Internet Explorer: Microsoft warns of critical IE9, IE10 zero-day-Just visit the wrong web site and get remote-code execution.
In Firefox, go to Tools>Add-ons>Plugins and set the Java Script and Toolkit to Ask to Activate. I also set all the other plugins to Ask to Activate as well. This prevents a plugin from activating at the wrong time and thereby sending out data to the site that caused it to activate. A malicious site may activate a plugin to have it to transmit data that can be used to thwart your investigation.
Third party cookies compile a long-term record of your browsing history. This is dangerous as it can reveal what you are investigating. In Options>Privacy>History select Never for third party cookies. In my sandbox, I have several versions of the browser with different settings. For example, I prefer to never accept cookies of any kind, but some sites need them to function so I have a version with normal cookies enabled.
The online exif viewer at www.gbimg.org has a lot of widgets on it.
My last discovery was the Exif site at http://www.findpicturelocation.com. Just upload the picture and it will show the location where it was taken. It only works with .jpg or .tif files. You must upload the image to the site, so who knows where it might end-up. This uses the Google API for the mapping. Not all pictures have the GPS coordinates in them.
There is nothing slipperier than a politician or bureaucrat trying to avoid accountability while extolling how transparent and open they are. These craven creatures turn our access to information laws into the proverbial greased pig. Continue reading ‘Sly Pols & Crats’