When collecting data for a report, I come across data in a multitude of markup formats. A markup language is a format for annotating a document in a way that is distinguishable from the text. Each markup language has its own syntax. The differing syntax between languages creates a problem when I need to extract quotations, create citations, and create appendices. What I need is a program that can understand and convert document text annotated with different markup languages. It must handle footnotes, tables, definition lists, superscript and subscript, strikeout, enhanced ordered lists, and the render the text into a form usable by MS Word. It must also translate math equations into something useful.
If you have been struggling with this too, try a programme called panddoc. This programme will take a while to learn, but once you have experimented a little, you will learn how to solve most of your markup-to-report conversion problems.
Wearable cameras have some utility for the investigator. Here are three that are at the leading edge of this trend.
This has been around for about one year and it is about the size of an iPod shuffle. the newest version has an eight megapixel sensor and a wider angle lens with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth that allows using your mobile phone as a remote to control or you can transfer photos over Wi-Fi. The camera battery lasts for 30 hours and when you charge the battery with your computer you also offload the photos.
It doesn’t take video, just still images, but you can expect that to come in the future.
Logitech is better known for its keyboards, mice, and webcams. The Bemo is between wearable cameras and larger devices such as the HTC Re. It includes a clip, but its video must be activated by holding down the button. Part of this may be due to the product’s relatively slow Bluetooth connection back to the phone, a design that yields better battery life. The Bemo captures 8 megapixel photos and high-definition video.
This company is best known for smartphones. The Re is larger than the Bemo and lacks an integrated clip, but HTC has some accessories that allow it to be worn. In addition to video, also captures the highest-resolution photos at 16 megapixels and it has a wide-angle lens. The Re is always on and ready to capture as soon it’s picked up. It has a time-lapse mode to create a video made up of a day’s worth of stills without one having to be there.
None of these devices have a screen or flash and video shot in low-light may be blurry or grainy. They all connect to a smartphone which makes it easy to handle the captured images and video.
I recently investigated the circumstances surrounding a drowning death in a commercial property. The most disturbing and contentious thing was that several people didn’t recognise that a person was in need of assistance and drowning.
The witness statements to that effect were the cause of a lot of avoidable unpleasantness. Most people don’t understand that drowning people rarely splash about, wave, or scream for help. This only happens on television and unfortunately, that is where most people get their impression of what drowning looks like.
The article, Drowning: A Deceptively Quiet Event, represents a good summary of my report on what a drowning really looks like.
Back in November I wrote about the Drones and the PI and the Canadian Air Regulations.
In Britain, the Civil Aviation Authority has approved three companies to provide training for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) operators who fly UAVs weighing less than 45 pounds.
Upon completion of the training, the pilot must provide the Civil Aviation Authority with an explanation of how the drone will be used and provide proof of liability insurance. Then the pilot may receive flight permission, with a few stipulations. Generally, those stipulations are that they must fly in the line of sight and not within 50 meters of people or buildings. UAVs weighing over 15 pounds must get clearance from air traffic control and those under 15 pounds may operate freely in airspace that isn’t congested, such as near airports.
This seems to rule out their legal use for surveillance and security purposes.
As I make my way through the infernal regions of the Internet, I have had to start using new tools. The most disconcerting form of torment has been the change to Linux to avoid malicious code. This has forced me to start using alternatives to Microsoft Office for some work.
There is nothing more disconcerting than changing word processing software. Nothing is in the right place and productivity decreases dramatically. I’m not sure which of the two flavours of the open source alternatives I like best–I lean towards LibreOffice at this point.
Some people who don’t really work for a living will say it’s stupid to try to attempt to use Microsoft Office on Linux, but they don’t have to quickly produce reports on a daily basis. I have tried running MS Office 2010 (32 bit) with some success using Wine. This makes report creation easier and faster. However, this isn’t as stable as using LibreOffice–but that’s perdition for you.
Over the last couple of years we have seen a trend developing in the nether regions of the Internet that is changing how I conduct research. This netherworld is populated by malign crooks who create sites loaded with malicious code.
I now conduct a lot of research using fresh installs of Linux and the programmes that I need for each job. I conduct the research from behind my own anonymizing proxy and an assortment of VPNs. Browsers operate in a sandbox to prevent movement of malicious code from an attack site to other programmes on my machine.
This is a nasty environment. It takes time and experience to operate in this infernal region. In two years I have learned a lot, but most of all, I have learned how little I really know. The crooks are much further along the learning curve in this environment.
The excellent book The Dark Side Of Man reports that David Luckenbill studied all of the murderers in a California county over a 10-year period and asked them why they killed their victims. All the death row inmates interviewed listed one of only two reasons for killing:
- 34% said they killed because the victim challenged the killer’s authority
- 66% said they killed because the victim insulted them in some way
What matters is the criminal’s perception. If he perceives a challenge or an insult, he is more likely to kill you.
This information provides a basis for planning a strategy for dealing with criminal violence.
Understand that the criminal is not operating under the same moral imperatives as his victim. A large proportion of violent criminals are psychopaths without any empathy for their victims. Never think, “He won’t shoot me because I wouldn’t shoot him in the same situation.” You would be wrong and this will cost you your life.
False bravado will also get you killed. Criminals learn to quickly judge people and use that judgement to manipulate them. Your bluff will be transparent and you will experience a violent response to your challenge.
Never insult an attacker. There is a big difference between screaming “GET AWAY FROM ME!” and screaming “GET AWAY FROM ME YOU MOTHERFUCKER!” Insulting an armed criminal will not yield positive results.
Be especially cautious during the times when the criminal is under the most stress and be chose your words carefully, especially at the early and end stages of the attack.
Develop a verbal response for the most likely scenarios you may face rather than thinking on the fly, just say exactly what you have practiced. Your script should avoid any challenging language or insults. Deliver your script in a calm monotone even if you are planning violent resistance. Surprise is a very potent weapon in your arsenal.
If you are in an environment that exposes you or your staff to the risk of criminal attack, then The Dark Side Of Man is a book you must read.
Know your enemy and plan to prevail.
The use of an unmanned aircraft (UAV) or drone to conduct surveillance is contentious public issue when government does it. When the private sector does it, it is particularly contentious.
As a speaker at a training event in Toronto, Ontario, I was asked about using UAVs for surveillance. This surprised me, as these were experienced private investigators. What follows was my answer to these questions.
If a private investigator intrudes into an area where the subject has a reasonable expectation of privacy and takes pictures and video, then that material is likely to be excluded by any court in Canada. The investigator must respect the Criminal Code as well as all municipal, provincial, and territorial laws regarding trespassing and privacy. The investigator may also face criminal charges or civil suit. A civil suit will name everybody even remotely associated with the sordid affair. These consequences pale in the face of what will happen next.
When a UAV is used for work done for hire and reward, as in a private investigation, a Special Operation Flight Certificate (SFOC) from Transport Canada is required. Aeronautics Act defines hire and reward as “any payment, consideration, gratuity or benefit, directly or indirectly charged, demanded, received or collected by any person for the use of an aircraft.”
The Canadian Air Regulations (CAR) Section 602.41 states that no person shall operate an unmanned air vehicle in flight except in accordance with a Special Flight Operation Certificate. Any violation of the CAR may result in substantial penalties: up to $5000 for an individual and $25,000 for a corporation. The UAV operator bears civil liability if property damage or injury occurs. If the video or image evidence was gathered in contravention of CAR do you think any court would allow the material in evidence? If the court did allow it, would the rest of your evidence be credible?
It takes 20 days to get a SFOC for each flight. Do you think the Transport Canada would even consider giving a private investigator such a permit? Can you plan your surveillance 20 days in advance?
In the U.S.A., commercial operation of a UAV it is still illegal. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering allowing commercial UAV use in 2015.
To be a successful private investigator follow my three rules.
- Spend 95% of your workday doing billable tasks.
- Be incredibly organized, and maintain a fastidious filing system.
- Don’t get distracted by things that aren’t billable hours.
When you start to investigate a particular Internet site, I suggest you begin with these resources.
Domain Dossier Investigate domains and IP addresses. Get registrant information, DNS records, and more—all in one report.
InterNIC Public Information Regarding Internet Domain Name Registration Services
Network Solutions’ Whois
DomainSearch.com Search multiple top level domains at once to see if the domain name is in use. I use it to find the domain name in other top level domains.
Convert Host/Domain Name to IP Address and vice versa Find the IP of a host machine (convert host to IP) or domain name (convert domain name to ip address) or find the name of one of the hosts at an IP address (convert ip address).
Using Traceroute Learn how to use and interpret traceroute results.
Additions thanks to Kirby:
hostcabi.net Provides lot of information, but most importantly, it identifies other users of same Google Analytics account and all the sites using that account.
sitedossier.com Sometimes shows older servers, which is useful when website has upgraded to cloud service or CloudFlare.
Date formats are easily misinterpreted. For example, if you write 06-07-07, an American might assume that it represents June 7, 2007 or 1907 and an European might assume that it is 6 July 1907 or 2007. Some might recommend using an unambiguous date system, such as an ISO 8601 European date format, (YYYY-MM-DD) but unless the reader is a government worker they might get the month and date mixed-up.
The best method is to use a 3-letter abbreviation for the month preceded by the day and followed by the full year to avoid any confusion thusly, 6 Jul 2007.
The European Union “right to be forgotten” law that allows individuals to demand the removal of links from Google’s EU search sites is starting to come into play.
The EU “Right to be Forgotten” is clearly a form of censorship in the 28 member nations and 4 other European countries that encompasses over 500 million people. Google has 90% of the search engine market there.
Demanding the removal of an indexed item only renews interest in the story. As the law only applies to Google and not the pages themselves or other search engines, traffic to the articles in question increases thanks to journalists calling attention to them once they receive notification that the article was removed from the EU sites. This is known as The Streisand Effect.
European Google search results for any name display the disclaimer that, “Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe,” even if nobody requested the removal of anything.
Of course, people will soon tire of writing about the removed articles and people will stop demanding the removal of indexed items.
Certainly, a free speech enthusiasts will start to collate all the missing search results and make them available. This has already started with Hidden From Google. This site archives articles that Google must remove from European Union search results. I’m certain a Twitter account like @gdnvanished will also appear to provide similar content.
The easiest way to circumvent this censorship is to search using the Google.com site instead of the local EU search sites—or better yet, use other search engines like DuckDuckGo, Yandex, and blekko.
I was working on a small surveillance crew recently and we needed to change our appearances on the fly. Changing clothing is an old ploy but it wasn’t enough for this group of very alert subjects.
We bought used clothing in bigger sizes than we normally wear. I tested this clothing around people who haven’t seen me in a while. They all commented on how much weight I had lost. Some asked if I had been sick. I didn’t change, but the clothes made me look like I had lost 30 pounds. Adding a little makeup under my eyes made some people think I had a terminal illness.
Perception goes a long way. People quickly jump to conclusions–my disguise made sure it was the conclusion I wanted them to make.