<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Confidential Resource &#187; Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.confidentialresource.com/category/canada-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com</link>
	<description>Sources &#38; Methods for the Investigator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ontario Name Changes Easier in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2012/01/11/ontario-name-changes-easier-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2012/01/11/ontario-name-changes-easier-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Name Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=3098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is now easier for the divorced, widowed, and those who have annulled to revert to their former surnames. The process is simpler and only costs $25.  Previously, the application was required within only 90 days or it was a more expensive and lengthy process. The new law eliminates the 90 day time limit. This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is now easier for the divorced, widowed, and those who have annulled to revert to their former surnames. The process is simpler and only costs $25.  Previously, the application was required within only 90 days or it was a more expensive and lengthy process. The new law eliminates the 90 day time limit.</p>
<p>This will impact skip tracers as this change becomes more widely known. While it is now harder for debtors to use an Ontario name change to elude creditors, it still happens.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2012/01/11/ontario-name-changes-easier-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bulk Sales &amp; the PI</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/12/07/bulk-sales-the-pi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/12/07/bulk-sales-the-pi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitive Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=2844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BULK SALES ACT SEARCHES &#8211; Ontario Only Sales of large quantities of stock or the sale of assets and equipment of the business itself outside the regular course of business are considered a sale &#8220;in bulk&#8221;. The Bulk Sales Act is designed to protect the creditors of a business owner by requiring the owner to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>BULK SALES ACT SEARCHES &#8211; Ontario Only</h2>
<p>Sales of large quantities of stock or the sale of assets and equipment of the business itself outside the regular course of business are considered a sale &#8220;in bulk&#8221;. <a href="http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90b14_e.htm" target="_blank">The Bulk Sales Act</a> is designed to protect the creditors of a business owner by requiring the owner to follow the procedures of the Act for sales outside the regular course of business.</p>
<p>If a buyer wishes to purchase the assets and equipment of a business, the seller &#8220;in bulk&#8221; must provide an affidavit stating that all creditors have been paid, or they will be paid from the proceeds of the sale.  In some cases the buyer pays an assigned trustee and creditors of the business may wish to waive their rights in which case the proceeds are paid.</p>
<p>A &#8216;<strong>Bulk Sales search</strong>&#8216; determines if a bulk sales affidavit has been filed with the relevant Ontario Superior Court of Justice office.</p>
<h2>The Private Investigator (PI)</h2>
<p>If you are interested in an Ontario business&#8217;s assets, debts, cash flow, and general financial condition, then a a Bulk Sale Act search is an important search.  It may tell you if the business is failing or if it has suffered a set-back.  You may learn of an abandoned line or the sale of a production facility.  You may learn of a legal action in another jurisdiction by contacting or researching the other parties to the bulk sale. Any sale that indicates that creditors will be paid from the proceeds of the sale may indicate a judgment that is being satisfied or it may be part of the settlement of a claim.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/12/07/bulk-sales-the-pi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bank Act &amp; the PI</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/12/05/the-bank-act-the-pi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/12/05/the-bank-act-the-pi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Diligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=2841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bank Act The Bank Act (1991, c. 46) is an Act of the Government of Canada respecting banks and banking.  The Canadian banking industry includes 20 domestic banks, 24 foreign bank subsidiaries and 22 foreign bank branches operating in Canada. Canadian Banks &#38; Lending Canadian Banks have the right to lend money to wholesalers, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>The Bank Act</h2>
<p>The <a href="http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-1.01/" target="_blank"><strong>Bank Act</strong> (1991, c. 46)</a> is an Act of the Government of Canada respecting banks and banking.  The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banks_in_Canada" target="_blank">Canadian banking industry</a> includes 20 domestic banks, 24 foreign bank subsidiaries and 22 foreign bank branches operating in Canada.</p>
<h2>Canadian Banks &amp; Lending</h2>
<p>Canadian Banks have the right to lend money to wholesalers, retailers, shippers and dealers in &#8220;products of agriculture, products of aquaculture, products of the forest, products of the quarry and mine, products of the sea, lakes, and rivers, of goods, wares and merchandise, manufactured or otherwise&#8221; on the security of such goods or products, and to lend money to manufacturers on their goods and inventories.</p>
<h2>The Private Investigator (PI)</h2>
<p>When doing a background investigation of a person, the PI will be looking for previously unknown assets, banking and financial arrangements, or corporate affiliations.  When investigating a company, the PI will be looking for previously unknown assets, banking, and financial arrangements.  In both cases, the equity held by the subject in the assets will be of interest.  Searching the Bank Act Security Registry may reveal all of the above.</p>
<h2><em>Bank Act</em><strong> Security Registry</strong></h2>
<p>Under<a href="http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-1.01/page-138.html" target="_blank"> S. 427</a> of the Bank Act, the borrower must sign a document that provides the bank with the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">first preferential lien</span> on the goods or equipment.  The Bank then registers a &#8216;<em>Notice of Intention</em>&#8216; to take the goods as security, to perfect its security interest.</p>
<p>The Bank of Canada offers a Security Registry service which may be searched for registrations.  The<em> </em>search will reveal whether the Bank of Canada has taken security on property that may interest you.  If the Bank does have a claim on the property, then it means that it has loaned the customer money and that it has the right to take possession of and sell the property if the loan is not paid.  This is important for you to know for two reasons.  First, it shows that the person or business is indebted to a Canadian chartered bank and may have equity in the property listed in the security agreement.  Second, it may uncover previously unknown assets, banking and financial arrangements, or corporate affiliations. You will need to provide the name of the person or business being searched.</p>
<p>Years ago, we only did this when we suspected the subject person or company might have an interest in an agricultural business.  Today however, we find more non-agricultural businesses in the Bank of Canada registry. We have online access to the Bank of Canada registry to search for Bank Act Security items. <span style="font-size: small;">The search results often indicate that a business assigned its inventory to a bank as security under the Bank Act. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">A manual search for Notices of Intention filed under Section 427 of the Bank Act are conducted at the agency of the Bank of Canada in the province or territory where the debtor&#8217;s place of business is located.</span> For Bank Act searches, <dfn><span style="font-size: small;"> “agency”</span></dfn><span style="font-size: small;"> means, in a province, the office of the Bank of Canada or its authorized representative but does not include its Ottawa office, and in Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut means the office of the clerk of the court of each of those territories respectively [see <dfn>S. 427(5)</dfn>].</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/12/05/the-bank-act-the-pi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toronto Prostitution Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/09/30/toronto-prostitution-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/09/30/toronto-prostitution-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=2504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an Investigator, I often have to search for references to a certain telephone number.  A few years ago, these searches started to involve looking for a possible prostitution involvement.  This is a search for which I frequently get requests. Doing this isn&#8217;t rocket science, so here is my current list of sites.  Of course, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Investigator, I often have to search for references to a certain telephone number.  A few years ago, these searches started to involve looking for a possible prostitution involvement.  This is a search for which I frequently get requests.</p>
<p>Doing this isn&#8217;t rocket science, so here is my current list of sites.  Of course, I have devised a way of automating the search process and I&#8217;m not going to tell you how I do that.  Just remember, you must document your search method and the results properly if this is could end-up as evidence.</p>
<h2>Censorship: You be the Judge</h2>
<p>Google Ad-sense sent an automated notice that their machines were going to stop serving ads because I listed the sites that we often search for telephone numbers as explained above.  Of course machines can&#8217;t read, but they can find links. Now Google is censoring content because they don&#8217;t like to place ads on anything that has links to sites that they don&#8217;t like, in this case so-called &#8216;adult content&#8217;.  I can understand not wanting to be involved in promoting pornography or the sex trade, but this is only a machine telling me what to write and there is nobody to talk to and no living person at Google ever read this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/09/30/toronto-prostitution-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Scams Investigators Fall For</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/09/09/two-scams-investigators-fall-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/09/09/two-scams-investigators-fall-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone ping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPIC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=2486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cell Phone Pings Some companies claim to be able to perform real-time “ping” geo-location tracking of almost any cell phone. After paying, the Investigator is told that the cell phone is being pinged but has not answered and the Investigator is out hundreds of dollars. This is not how Location Based Services work in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Cell Phone Pings</h2>
<p>Some companies claim to be able to  perform real-time “ping” geo-location tracking of almost any cell phone. After paying, the Investigator is told that the cell phone is being pinged  but has not answered and the Investigator is out hundreds of dollars. This is not how Location Based Services work in a mobile phone network.</p>
<h2>Canadian Criminal Records</h2>
<p>Some companies, usually in the U.S.A., claim that they can do <a href="http://www.confidentialresource.com/2009/11/06/bungled-criminal-background-investigation/" target="_blank">CPIC searches</a>. The normal answer is that nothing was found. Of course no search of any kind was performed. They also charge for searches by province when CPIC covers all of Canada. Sometimes, the single-province searches are advertised as CPIC but actually search the provincial court case management system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/09/09/two-scams-investigators-fall-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s New Anti-Spam Law</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/08/26/canadas-new-anti-spam-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/08/26/canadas-new-anti-spam-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=2442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet News reports Canada’s Anti-Spam Law Coming Into Force, Osler, July 5, 2011 Canadian government has passed legislation to address spam (though it is still awaiting proclamation). &#8220;Known as Canada’s Anti-Spam Law, or CASL1, the new rules go much further than restricting bulk, unsolicited e-mail messages, by creating an express consent regime that applies to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.websearchguide.ca/netblog/archives/010464.html" target="_blank">Internet News</a></strong> reports <a href="http://www.osler.com/NewsResources/Details.aspx?id=3614" target="_blank"><strong>Canada’s Anti-Spam Law Coming Into Force</strong></a>, Osler, July 5, 2011</p>
<p>Canadian government has passed legislation to address spam (though it is still awaiting proclamation).</p>
<p>&#8220;Known as Canada’s Anti-Spam Law, or CASL1, the new rules go much  further than restricting bulk, unsolicited e-mail messages, by creating  an express consent regime that applies to almost all e-mails and other  electronic messages sent for a commercial purpose. And unlike the U.S.  CAN-SPAM Act, which applies only to e-mail, CASL’s anti-spam provisions  also apply to other forms of electronic communication, such as text  messages, instant messaging and social media messaging.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/08/26/canadas-new-anti-spam-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CarFax, CarProof, &amp; AutoCheck</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/08/15/carfax-carproof-autocheck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/08/15/carfax-carproof-autocheck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=2426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written about using CarFax and CarProof before. CarFax is owned by CarMax, while AutoCheck is owned by the large U.S.credit reporting agency, Experian.  AutoCheck is not to confused with Auto Check™ which is an online database containing information about accident damaged, insurance “total loss” branded and stolen vehicles that was developed in 1995 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written about using <a href="http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/05/06/more-than-a-vehicle-registration/" target="_blank">CarFax and CarProof</a> before.</p>
<p>CarFax is owned by CarMax, while <a href="http://www.autocheck.com" target="_blank">AutoCheck</a> is owned by the large U.S.credit reporting agency, Experian.  AutoCheck is not to confused with<a href="http://www.autocheck.ca/" target="_blank"> Auto Check™</a> which is an online database containing information about  accident  damaged, insurance “total loss” branded and stolen vehicles that was   developed in 1995 by the Used Car Dealers Association of Ontario, for the exclusive use of its members.</p>
<p>AutoCheck purchases the data from the auto auctions and CarFax does not. As a result of this, CarFax often fails to report previous accidents and things like frame damage.  Autocheck is the de facto standard at the auto auctions.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span>In Canada <a href="https://www.carproof.com/home.aspx" target="_blank">Carproof</a> is by far the better system, as they have more access to  insurance data, repair shop estimates, lien  history, police and ministry of Transportation data, and more.</p>
<p>An Investigator armed with a vehicle&#8217;s VIN, and who is willing to pay the fees, just might find out about an undisclosed vehicle accident using one of these services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/08/15/carfax-carproof-autocheck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC Environmental Law Violators</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/08/10/bc-environmental-law-violators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/08/10/bc-environmental-law-violators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=2409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmental law violators in British Columbia are now in a searchable online database. “The free database includes a wide variety of compliance and enforcement actions taken by ministry staff and enforcement officers. It includes orders, administrative sanctions, tickets and court convictions covering hunting and fishing, open burning, mud bogging, dam safety, and pesticide and pollution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmental law violators in British Columbia are now in a <a href="http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/main/compliance-reporting/" target="_blank">searchable online database</a>. “The free database includes a wide variety of compliance and enforcement actions taken by ministry staff and enforcement officers. It includes orders, administrative sanctions, tickets and court convictions covering hunting and fishing, open burning, mud bogging, dam safety, and pesticide and pollution violations.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/08/10/bc-environmental-law-violators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Division of Powers &#8212; Property Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/07/20/divison-of-powers-property-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/07/20/divison-of-powers-property-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to Become a Professional Private Investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Division of Powers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=2282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The provinces have been granted power over &#8220;property and civil rights in the province&#8221; in Section 92(13) of  The Constitution Act, 1867. This division of power forced the Trudeau government to remove the right to private property from the Charter of Rights when the provinces protested its inclusion. The provinces saw this as limiting their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The provinces have been granted power over &#8220;property and civil rights in the province&#8221; in <a href="http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/const/const1867.html#distribution" target="_blank">Section 92(13) of  The Constitution Act, 1867.</a></p>
<p>This division of power forced the Trudeau government to remove the right to private property from the Charter of Rights when the provinces protested its inclusion. The provinces saw this as limiting their ability to tax, expropriate, and exercise control over property ownership. Neither the federal nor provincial governments are under any constitutional obligation to pay fair (or any) compensation for expropriated property. The Constitution Act 1867 and the Charter of Rights do not address this issue. Legislatures are also free to legislate away your ability to use any property for any purpose. Ontario and Quebec will probably try this route to control firearms ownership once the Long Arm Registry is eliminated by the federal government.</p>
<p>This is starting to backfire. Landowner associations and grass-roots movements are starting to form in <a href="http://www.ontariolandowners.ca/" target="_blank">Ontario </a>and <a href="http://www.freealberta.com/property_rights.html" target="_blank">Alberta</a>.  These groups and <a href="http://www.apri.ca/" target="_blank">movements to include property rights </a>into the Charter of Rights will become a prominent feature of the political landscape in years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/07/20/divison-of-powers-property-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPIC Not Updated in a Timely Fashion</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/06/13/cpic-not-updated-in-a-timely-fashion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/06/13/cpic-not-updated-in-a-timely-fashion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard McEachin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auditor-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=2223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent Auditor-General report reveals some problems at the RCMP that I have suspected for years. Auditor-General reports going back to 2000 have criticized the CPIC system (see 7.86) regarding timely delivery of criminal record data. The problem we encounter most often is the backlog of criminal records that has seen the updating of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most recent Auditor-General report reveals some problems at the RCMP that I have suspected for years. Auditor-General <a href="http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_200004_07_e_11194.html#0.2.2Z141Z1.HAVW4L.JMF3SF.H9" target="_blank">reports going back to 2000 have criticized the CPIC system</a> (see 7.86) regarding timely delivery of criminal record data.</p>
<p>The problem we encounter most often is the backlog of criminal records that has seen the updating of some records taking 3 years.</p>
<p>The Auditor-General estimates that the RCMP takes an average of 14 months to update an English criminal record in CPIC. The French updates take an average of 36 months. The stated goal is updating a record in 24 hours. <a href="http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201106_05_e_35373.html#ex9" target="_blank">Unfortunately, reality is an average time of 334 working days</a> (see 5.60).</p>
<p>At some point this is going to result in tragedy. Even more unfortunate, is the fact that the RCMP and the government is judgment-proof for this negligent behaviour. The investigation company used by employers and  their insurance companies aren&#8217;t as lucky. Even if a claim is rejected by the courts, the legal expenses may destroy the company for reporting in good faith what was on CPIC.</p>
<p>How will this play out when a sex offender is hired to work with vulnerable people. What will happen when that same offender follows his natural instincts and victimizes someone.</p>
<p>It is also conceivable that this situation will also thicken our border with the U.S.A. as  their authorities start to act upon their distrust of CPIC. Frequent border-crossers, such as truck drivers, will be subjected to additional delays. If that extends to airports we can expect more security searches, questioning, and delays.</p>
<p>The problems we see with CPIC should be a warning about all supposedly trusted and sole source systems. All such systems break-down!</p>
<p>When we are forced to trust one system, especially a critical system, and that system fails, we are all vulnerable. It doesn&#8217;t matter it is health care or CPIC, without reliable alternatives, people will be hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2011/06/13/cpic-not-updated-in-a-timely-fashion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

