<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This isn&#8217;t Competitive Intelligence</title>
	<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2008/03/24/this-isnt-competitive-intelligence/</link>
	<description>Sources &#38; Methods for the Investigator</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2008/03/24/this-isnt-competitive-intelligence/#comment-10285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2008/03/24/this-isnt-competitive-intelligence/#comment-10285</guid>
		<description>I agree this is an example of cheap and bush-league competitive intelligence.  Maybe if you are lucky enough to get someone who doesn't know better, you can get the desired details however if you get someone who is wise, chances are that they are ready to provide false but believable information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree this is an example of cheap and bush-league competitive intelligence.  Maybe if you are lucky enough to get someone who doesn&#8217;t know better, you can get the desired details however if you get someone who is wise, chances are that they are ready to provide false but believable information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2008/03/24/this-isnt-competitive-intelligence/#comment-9931</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2008/03/24/this-isnt-competitive-intelligence/#comment-9931</guid>
		<description>Which nonsense?  The original ruse or the reply?  Both seem too "cat and mouse" for me to feel good about endorsing either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which nonsense?  The original ruse or the reply?  Both seem too &#8220;cat and mouse&#8221; for me to feel good about endorsing either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
