<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Private Investigators Indicted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.confidentialresource.com/2007/12/07/ten-private-investigators-indicted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2007/12/07/ten-private-investigators-indicted/</link>
	<description>Sources &#38; Methods for the Investigator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:05:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Farr</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2007/12/07/ten-private-investigators-indicted/#comment-8046</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Farr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=160#comment-8046</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve looked through the state&#039;s licensing site ... and no sign of these three dummies.  Why is it the U.S. Attorney, the press and just about everyone refers to them as &quot;private investigators&quot; when they&#039;re obviously not??  I&#039;m writing everyone I can think of about it.  &#039;Stains the entire industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve looked through the state&#8217;s licensing site &#8230; and no sign of these three dummies.  Why is it the U.S. Attorney, the press and just about everyone refers to them as &#8220;private investigators&#8221; when they&#8217;re obviously not??  I&#8217;m writing everyone I can think of about it.  &#8216;Stains the entire industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
