<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tort for Negligent Investigations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.confidentialresource.com/2007/11/15/tort-for-negligent-investigations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2007/11/15/tort-for-negligent-investigations/</link>
	<description>Sources &#38; Methods for the Investigator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pardon criminal</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialresource.com/2007/11/15/tort-for-negligent-investigations/#comment-10869</link>
		<dc:creator>pardon criminal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confidentialresource.com/?p=143#comment-10869</guid>
		<description>its rather strange that he was convicted on such a limited level of evidence. Most criminal lawyers could have instilled some sense of doubt into a jury but to be convicted by circumstantial evidence and a partial eye witness identification is rather poor prosecution. No wonder he sued, that ruling was BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its rather strange that he was convicted on such a limited level of evidence. Most criminal lawyers could have instilled some sense of doubt into a jury but to be convicted by circumstantial evidence and a partial eye witness identification is rather poor prosecution. No wonder he sued, that ruling was BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
